Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1910No. 359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The charging part of the indictment avers that appellant “did then and there unlawfully engage in the practice of medicine for pay and as a regular practitioner in its various branches and departments, and as such practitioner did prescribe for and visit patients professionally, to wit: Did prescribe for and visit Mrs. Hattie Sessions, without having first filed for record with the clerk of the District Court of said county, a certificate from some authorized board of medical examiners, and without having filed for record with the clerk of the District Court of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Less v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API