Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coleman v. Kansas Natural-gas, Oil, Pipe-line & Improvement Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1905No. 14,305PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto, brought on the relation of the attorney-general against the Kansas Natural-gas, Oil, Pipeline and Improvement Company, a private corporation organized under the laws of Kansas for the transportation and distribution of gas for light, fuel, and power, to oust it from burying its pipe-lines in the public highway. The defendant bases its claim of right thus to occupy the public highway on permission obtained from the abutting fee-owners. The gas company has filed a motion to dismiss this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of La Harpe v. Elm Township Gas, Light, Fuel & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. McCann v. Johnson County Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Murphy v. Ludowici Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Mall v. C. & W. Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. State ex rel. Bartlett v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Robinson Oil Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API