Winkle Pontiac Motorsports, Inc. v. Shepherd
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.
This action is currently before the court on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Federal jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
FACTS
Plaintiff Winkle Pontiac Motorsports, Inc. (Winkle) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Ohio. Winkle’s principal place of business is in Paulding, Ohio. First Amended Complaint ¶ 1. Part of Winkle’s business involves the building and racing of NASCAR Winston Cup and Busch Gran…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Kenneth R. Cate, Esquire, and Maher, Overchuck, Langa & Cate, a Florida Association v. Gordon G. Oldham, Jr., and State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Shatel Corp. v. Mao Ta Lumber and Yacht CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Cunningham v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Winkle Pontiac v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991