Legal Opinion

Winkle Pontiac Motorsports, Inc. v. Shepherd

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided October 20, 1988No. 1:88-CV-571-RHHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.

This action is currently before the court on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Federal jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

FACTS

Plaintiff Winkle Pontiac Motorsports, Inc. (Winkle) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Ohio. Winkle’s principal place of business is in Paulding, Ohio. First Amended Complaint ¶ 1. Part of Winkle’s business involves the building and racing of NASCAR Winston Cup and Busch Gran…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Kenneth R. Cate, Esquire, and Maher, Overchuck, Langa & Cate, a Florida Association v. Gordon G. Oldham, Jr., and State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Shatel Corp. v. Mao Ta Lumber and Yacht CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Cunningham v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winkle Pontiac v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API