Legal Opinion
State v. Ingram
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 6, 1984No. CA83-09-104PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
On April 16, 1983, between the hours of 5:00 and 5:30 p.m., Detective Bobby Sparks of the Monroe Police Department received a telephone call from Detective William Kingston of the Dayton Police Department. Kingston informed Sparks that defendant-appellant, Larry E. Ingram, and one Jimmy Stelts would be in Monroe that evening for the ostensible purpose of committing burglaries in the Monroe area. Kingston also informed Sparks that the duo would be driving a dark brown or maroon 1977 Cadillac owned by Ingram bearing Ohio license plates AKN 969. In addition, Sparks was informed that Ingram had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EtheringtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. FreemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. PaladinOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. Taylor, 22501 (12-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.