Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re the Estate of Du Bray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 30, 1987Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kane, J. P., concurs in part and dissents in part in a memorandum. Kane, J. P. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

My only disagreement with the majority is in their limitation on the extent of discovery to a three-year period preceding, and the two years succeeding, the execution of the will. The limitations referred to are merely rules of thumb for the "average case” (Matter of Kaufmann, 11 AD2d 759, 760). In my view, this is not the "average case” and the circumstances presented suggest that there may be relevant information to be obtained from records beyond the limitations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of KaufmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API