Legal Opinion

Chicago Transit Authority v. Danaher

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 27, 1976No. 61348PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing

The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and the Chicago Housing Authority (CHA), as intervenor, brought a declaratory judgment action against Matthew J. Danaher, clerk of the circuit court of Cook County (Danaher), alleging that they are “units of local government” and consequently should not be required to pay any filing fees to the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to section 14.1 of “An Act concerning fees and salaries 0 * " ” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 53, par. 31.1), which in pertinent part states:

“No fee provided herein shall be charged to any unit of local government or school district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. LowdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hills v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. People Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. CaliendoIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People Ex Rel. Wellman v. WashburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. StevensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Du Page Aviation Corp. v. Du Page Airport AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Troutman v. KeysAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Pace v. Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Andrews v. County of MadisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Schmeier v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API