Legal Opinion

Strong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1995No. F 94-517PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1102 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD, DISSOLVING STAY, AND SETTING DUE DATE OF APPEAL BRIEF

Appellant has tendered for filing a motion to supplement the record in the above-styled appeal from his Judgment and Sentence in Case No. CF-93^4643 in the District Court of Tulsa County. In that case, Appellant was convicted by a jury of Possession of a Stolen Vehicle, After Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies, and was sentenced to twenty-five (25) years in prison.

Appellant claims supplementation of the record in this appeal is necessary to support an allegation that his trial counsel was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilhoit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berget v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Woodruff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Maxey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API