Legal Opinion
Bonhomme v. Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided February 16, 2007No. 05-3314PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On September 11, 2006, the appellant filed a “Motion for Remand to Consider New and Material Evidence” (Motion for Remand) and a “Motion for Suspension of Rules Pursuant to Rule 2” until his other motion was decided. See U.S. VetApp. R. 2. On October 25, 2006, the Secretary filed his opposition to the Motion for Remand.
On November 17, 2005, the appellant filed a Notice of Appeal (NOA) challenging an October 5, 2005, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board), which determined that he had not submitted new and material evidence to reopen his claim for disability benefits for a…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mayfield v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Robinson v. MansfieldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
- Pekular v. MansfieldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Werner G. Hood v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- D ENNIS L. W ASHINGTON v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Bonhomme v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.