Legal Opinion

Julian v. Schwartz

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1935No. L. A. 14609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Applications for writs of supersedeas. A similar application was made by the appellants L. V. Red-field, E. E. Poster and H. A. Penn, and denied on July 11, 1934, without prejudice, as being premature. (Julian v. Schwartz, 1 Cal. (2d) 269 [34 Pac. (2d) 487].) On July 23, 1934, the court made the special order after final judgment, as anticipated prior to the first application, directing the trustees to pay impounded moneys in stated amounts to the parties and to surrender possession of oil well property to certain of them as their interests appeared and were settled by the judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Julian v. SchwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Custom Component Switches, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Guardianship of MorroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Sandell, Inc. v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API