Legal Opinion

Daigle v. Joffrion

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1985No. CA 84 0263PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

This is a boundary action. The question presented is whether through ten year acquisitive prescription a boundary has been established by defendants between their land and the adjoining land owned by the plaintiffs.1

*218The procedural posture of this case is set forth by the trial court as follows:

“On July 25, 1979, one Howard Daigle, Sr., claiming to be the owner of an undivided interest in a tract of land in the Parish of Assumption containing ... thirty four arpents no/100 superficies ... and known as the ‘Dugas-Alleman’ tract, filed suit to have the boundary fixed between his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Authement v. TheriotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Winjum v. DuplantisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Guillot v. AllemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daigle v. JoffrionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API