Legal Opinion
Daigle v. Joffrion
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1985No. CA 84 0263PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
This is a boundary action. The question presented is whether through ten year acquisitive prescription a boundary has been established by defendants between their land and the adjoining land owned by the plaintiffs.1
*218The procedural posture of this case is set forth by the trial court as follows:
“On July 25, 1979, one Howard Daigle, Sr., claiming to be the owner of an undivided interest in a tract of land in the Parish of Assumption containing ... thirty four arpents no/100 superficies ... and known as the ‘Dugas-Alleman’ tract, filed suit to have the boundary fixed between his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Authement v. TheriotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Winjum v. DuplantisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Guillot v. AllemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daigle v. JoffrionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985