Legal Opinion
Canich v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 7, 1958No. Civ. No. 9399PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a citizen of the State of Oregon, instituted this action in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County against The Greyhound Corporation, a corporation of the State of Delaware (Greyhound), and one John Doe (whose true name now appears to be “Thomas”), claiming personal injuries negligently caused when plaintiff disembarked from a passenger bus owned by Greyhound and being operated by John Doe (Thomas). The cause reached issue on or about December 4, 1956. On September 25, 1957, the Presiding Judge of the Circuit Court called the case and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Dollar S. S. Lines, Inc. v. MerzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stanhope v. Ford Motor Credit Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1980
- Beglane v. SwitzerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962