Legal Opinion

Haberle-Crystal Spring Brewing Co. v. Handrahan

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Decision on a demurrer to a counterclaim.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This action is brought under the provisions of section 1837 of the Code of Civil Procedure (which permits an action against the next of kin or legatees of a testator to recover a debt due from the latter), and is based upon the following facts: A short time prior to November, 1914, one John F. Mahar, a. resident of Onondaga county, died, leaving a last will and testament which was duly admitted to probate, in which one F. J. G. was named as executor, and the defendant, Catherine Handrahan, a sister of the said deceased, was the sole legatee named in said will. The said executor duly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blood v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Edgerton v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Fulton County Gas & Electric Co. v. Hudson River Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Ter Kuile v. MaralandNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Xenia Branch Bank v. LeeThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbia Nat. Bank v. RizerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Marley v. McLaughlinArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. J. M. & L. A. Osborn Co. v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API