Legal Opinion

People v. Cornette

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1958No. Crim. 1166PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Defendants E. J. Cornette, Dwight Ewing and Kenneth Koorndyk were held to answer and were subsequently charged jointly in an information in count one with conspiracy to obtain money or property under false pretenses (Pen. Code, §182). Five claimed overt acts are set forth, alleging generally the surrounding facts pertaining to five separate specified charges of grand theft contained in five separate counts involving the purported sale and installation by defendants of gas furnaces upon written contract for the parties named. On a motion to dismiss and set aside the information and action,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bompensiero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. People v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. De Mond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. NorthrupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API