Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C..J.,

This appeal is prosecuted to reverse a decree of the chancery court removing the disabilities of a minor for the purpose of signing an oil and gas leas-e with his adult brothers and sisters.

On June 1'2,1923, Walter Wilson by next friend filed a petition in the" Union Chancery Court, asking that his disabilities as a minor be removed in order to enable him to join with his adult brothers and sisters in executing an oil and gas lease. The chancery court granted the petition, and the decree recites that the petition was duly presented, and that, after hearing the testimony of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hindman v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Brown v. WheelockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Hester v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Gladish v. LovewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Grable v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jernigan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Crenshaw v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. May v. Spivey Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API