Legal Opinion

Kasser Egg Process Co. v. Poultry Producers of Central California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1931No. 6304PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this action for infringement of two patents issued to Samuel F. Henderson, No. 1,174,008, issued February 29, 1916, for the art of preserving eggs by the application of a colorless, odorless, tasteless, nonvolatile mineral oil to the shell of the egg, and patent No. 1,177,105, issued to him for the art of preserving and sterilizing eggs. Appellant states: “Both patents relate to and cover methods for preserving eggs by treating them with petrolatum. In addition, the first patent also covers, as a new product or .article of manufacture, an egg treated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dececo Co. v. George E. Gilchrist Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
  2. Consolidated Contract Co. v. Hassam Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  3. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter, Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  4. Neill v. KinneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chemical Const. Corp. v. Niagara Research Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API