Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Murchison

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1995No. Cr. 950106Published

1ConcurrenceLevine, Justice

Ordinarily, I believe the erroneous admission of prior convictions is prejudicial error. See State v. Eugene, 536 N.W.2d 692 (N.D.1995) (Levine, J., dissenting); State v. Bohe, 447 N.W.2d 277 (N.D.1989) (Levine, J., dissenting). I concur with the majority here only because Murchison raised an entrapment defense. When a defendant claims entrapment in a jurisdiction applying a subjective entrapment test, the government may rebut this defense with prior conviction evidence relevant to the defendant’s predisposition to commit the offense. See United States v. Bastanipour, 41 F.3d 1178 (7th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Solomon Bitton SimtobCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. James Leonard Parrish and Ralph W. Smith, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. State v. BoheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. United States v. Mohammad Ali BastanipourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API