Legal Opinion

Armata v. Abbott Laboratories

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by plaintiffs Judith Shepherd Armata, Kathleen Anna Maffa-Krailo and Marianne Margaret Alberigi unanimously dismissed and order modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: This appeal arises from an action commenced in New York alleging injuries from plaintiffs’ in útero exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES). Plaintiffs Judith Shepherd Armata, Kathleen Anna Maffa-Krailo and Marianne Margaret Alberigi (collectively, Massachusetts plaintiffs) were born in and are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Urcan v. CocarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Hager v. Denny's, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Brenckman v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armata v. Abbott LaboratoriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Matter of Luis S. v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. Parker v. Town of AlexandriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API