Legal Opinion

Eason v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 19, 2012No. CA 12-348PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

11 Jasmine Eason appeals from the February 9, 2012 order adjudicating her son, A.E., dependent-neglected. We affirm this fact-intensive case.

Background regarding A.C.1 and A.C.2

Jasmine has three children: A.C.1, A.C.2, and A.E. A.E. (D.O.B.10-10-2011) is the child at issue in this appeal. In order to put the dependency-neglect proceedings regarding A.E. into context, it is necessary to know that ADHS previously filed a petition for emergency custody and dependency-neglect regarding A.C.1 and A.C.2 on June 18, 2010. The supporting affidavit for the earlier petition…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brewer v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen-Grace v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Parnell v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Salinas v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API