Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Ptaszynska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Family Court properly denied that branch of the father’s motion which was, in effect, for permission to file a petition for a change of custody since the father failed to demonstrate nonfrivolous grounds for such relief (see Matter of Simpson v Ptaszynska, 41 AD3d 608 [2007]).

Contrary to the father’s contentions, the Family Court was not required to hold a hearing regarding visitation where he did not request a hearing, and the court had sufficient information to enable it to determine the best interests of the subject child (see Matter of Razo v Leyva, 3 AD3d 571 [2004]; Matter of Vangas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vangas v. LadasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Goldman v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Kuleszo v. KuleszoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Razo v. LeyvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Simpson v. PtaszynskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API