Schumacher v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinions were filed June 20, 1932:
Rosenberry, C. J.
The first proposition urged upon our attention here is that the city of Milwaukee, having been engaged by its servants in the performance of a governmental function, is not liable. Engel v. Milwaukee, 158 Wis. 480, 149 N. W. 141, and cases cited. Such is undoubtedly the law in the absence of statute imposing liability. A new section, sec. 66.095, was added to the statutes by the 1929 legislature. It reads as follows:
“Any person, firm or corporation suffering any damage proximately resulting from the negligent operation of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. KieferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Engel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by17 opinions
- Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Shannon v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Larson v. LesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Pohland v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Hayes v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.