Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinions were filed June 20, 1932:

Rosenberry, C. J.

The first proposition urged upon our attention here is that the city of Milwaukee, having been engaged by its servants in the performance of a governmental function, is not liable. Engel v. Milwaukee, 158 Wis. 480, 149 N. W. 141, and cases cited. Such is undoubtedly the law in the absence of statute imposing liability. A new section, sec. 66.095, was added to the statutes by the 1929 legislature. It reads as follows:

“Any person, firm or corporation suffering any damage proximately resulting from the negligent operation of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. KieferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Engel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Shannon v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Larson v. LesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Pohland v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hayes v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API