Legal Opinion
Steele v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 30, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1523Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADAM STEELE and, BRITTANY MONTROIS, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Case No. 14-1523 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. WALLACE G. DICKSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. 14-2221 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. VvvVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Wallace Dickson and plaintiffs Adam Steele and Brittany Montrois seek an order consolidating the above-captioned cases because they share common questions of law and fact. Plaintiff Dickson further moves for appointment of the law firms Hausfeld LLP and Boies Schiller & F lexner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loving v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Biondi v. ScrushyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- National Ass'n of Mortgage Brokers v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Loving v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.