Legal Opinion · Dissent

Winchester Management Corp. v. Staten

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1976No. 8157, 8163Published

1DissentFickling, Associate Judge

The majority contravene both the express language of Super.Ct. L & T R. 5(b) and established case law in this jurisdiction when they state (at p. 191) that:

Our decision today does not repudiate the tenants’ right to seek redress for the landlord’s failure to provide the promised air conditioning service during those periods in which the system was not functioning. We hold merely that such redress may not be sought by means of an equitable defense to an action for possession for nonpayment of rent, for such a grievance is insufficient to justify the withholding of rent and defeat a landlord’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. George Y. Worthington & Son Management Corp. v. LevyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Lalekos v. MansetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Molyneaux v. Town House, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Zindler v. BuchanonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Seidenberg v. BurkaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API