Legal Opinion

Sneddon v. Birch

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of a note in the sum of $650. The complaint alleged that the note and mortgage were executed and delivered by appellants to Thomas Sneddon; that the mortgage was duly acknowledged and afterward recorded; that thereafter Thomas Sneddon died; that his estate was duly probated and that the note and mortgage in controversy were decreed to Christina Sneddon, respondent herein.

The appellant, R. A. Birch, filed his separate answer in which he admitted that he signed the note and mortgage, but denied upon information and belief…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Christensen v. HollingsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Nelson Bennett Co. v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gray v. LawIdaho Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bruce v. FrameIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Simpson v. RemingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Furness v. ParkIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. First National Bank of Pocatello v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Credit Bureau of Preston v. SleightIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Petersen v. SwansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API