Legal Opinion

Baker v. Phillip Morris, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 2002No. 99-55391; D.C. No. CV-98-01864-IEGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

In light of the answer given to the question certified to the Supreme Court of California, Myers v. Phillip Morris Cos., 239 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir.2001), this case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for further proceedings consistent with the California Supreme Court’s holdings in the cases of Myers v. Philip Morris Cos., 28 Cal.4th 828, 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 40, 50 P.3d 751 (Cal.2002), and Naegele v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 28 Cal.4th 856, 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 61, 50 P.3d 769 (Cal.2002).

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Naegele v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Betty Jean Myers v. Phillip Morris Companies, inc.brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API