Legal Opinion

People v. Coapman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2011PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of, inter alia, two counts of criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [4]) and two counts of rape in the second degree (§ 130.30 [1]), defendant contends that he was deprived of the right to fair notice of the charges against him because the dates in the indictment on which the offenses allegedly occurred were overbroad. We reject that contention. “In view of the age of the victim and the date on which she reported the crimes, we conclude that the one-month and two-month periods specified in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. PopeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API