Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lemke v. Kenilworth Insurance Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1985No. 61391Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE SIMON,

specially concurring:

While I am in accord with the result reached here, I fear that the majority’s explanation as to why the “contact” issue was waived may be relied upon as a precedent, and this would, in my judgment, be misleading. The majority states that the circuit judge “did not address the propriety of dismissing the ‘contact’ count” (109 Ill. 2d at 352), that the plaintiff failed to specifically challenge dismissal of that count, and therefore the issue is waived. This analysis, as I view it, misreads the record. It also involves an incorrect application of the principle…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hargrove v. Gerill Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Village of Mundelein v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API