Central Union Trust Co. of New York v. Edwards
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Admittedly the. statute created an excise or privilege tax, not one directly laid on property. Admittedly, also, the tax is to be measured by property, and it states the philosophy or fundamentals of this difference between the treasury and the taxpayer, to inquire, Whose property? That of the trust company, or that of its shareholders? If one is to pay a tax measured by property, it assuredly seems more consonant with philosophical jurisprudence to measure the same by the property-of the taxpayer, rather than by the possessions of another. But taxes are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Home Savings Bank v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Henderson Bridge Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- People Ex Rel. Union Trust Co. v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ray Consolidated Copper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ray Consolidated Copper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924