Kann v. Wausau Abrasives Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
It will be useful to consider at the outset the only exception to the admission of evidence which has been argued by the plaintiff.
The defendant was permitted to introduce the correspondence between the parties leading up to the formation of the contract. To the admission of these letters, sixty-three in number, the plaintiff objected and was granted a general exception. The only ground of objection stated was “the immateriality of [the] evidence.”
In the course of its findings the trial court made the following statement:
“While the terms of the contract as finally reduced to writing are not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Helgar Corporation v. . Warner's FeaturesNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Keller v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. M. Webb & Co. v. Robert P. Miller Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Hunter Milling Co. v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Hunt v. Goodimate Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
- Barnard v. Old Colony InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Normand v. NormandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940