State v. Crockett
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
GERNON, J.:
Raymond Crockett appeals his conviction of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Following the jury trial, Crockett filed a motion to arrest judgment, contending the charging document was fatally defective because it failed to include an allegation of the overt act element of conspiracy. Crockett appeals the denial of his motion to arrest judgment.
K.S.A. 21-3302(a) provides that “[a] conspiracy is an agreement with another person to commit a crime or to assist in committing a crime.” Furthermore, K.S.A. 21-3302(a) proclaims that “[n]o person may be convicted of a conspiracy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- State v. HobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. ChismSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- State v. SanfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Swenson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. ShirleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
- State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.