Legal Opinion

Prosser v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 30, 1948No. 16,070PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

In July 1946, action was brought by Prosser against the Schmidts for specific performance. The evidence advanced in his behalf upon trial of the case was in brief as follows:

On February 14, 1942 Prosser and the Schmidts executed a contract in writing whereby, in consideration of receipt by them of fifty dollars, the Schmidts promised to convey to Prosser certain real property near the city of Florence, Colorado, for the sum of $1,500, the balance of $1,450 to be paid upon delivery of deed. The transaction was to be closed and possession given on or before May 1, 1942. Vendors covenanted to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoehne Ditch Co. v. John Flood Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Smiddy v. GraftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Mullen v. McKimSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. White v. GreenamyreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Thomas & Son Tr. Line, Inc. v. Kenyon, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Kuper v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Gray v. BlakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Bennett v. MoringColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API