Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wiederkehr Wine Cellars, Inc. v. City Natioanl Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1989No. 89-234Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Justice

In its petition for rehearing, appellants request the court to strike portions of appellee’s brief that contain suggestions of wrongdoing or ethical impropriety on the part of appellants’ counsel. In its opinion handed down December 4, 1989, this court unanimously agreed with appellants’ argument that such alleged ethical violations were not proper subjects in this appeal. Because such allegations are wholly extraneous to the issues in this case, appellants’ request to strike those allegations and language from the appellee’s brief should be granted. See Dunbar v. Bell, 90 Ark. 316, 119 S.W.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunbar v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API