Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence, and we further conclude, based upon our review of the record, that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). The testimony of the chemist, who performed the standard tests upon the substance defendant sold to a police informant, was sufficient to support the determination that the substance was cocaine (see, People v Hushie, 145 AD2d 506, 507, lv denied 73 NY2d 922).

Defendant failed to preserve for review his objections to the prosecutor’s summation.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. SherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. TindaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. People v. BusseyNew York Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API