Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Aycock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 17, 1930No. 7634PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. The bill of* exceptions recites that “during the term of court and before judgment was rendered on said verdict answering certain questions propounded by the court the defendant filed his motion in arrest of judgment. . . The same was denied.” There is no exception to this judgment. There is only an exception to the judgment refusing a new trial.

2. One ground of the motion for a new trial complains that the court *524erred in overruling tlie motion in arrest of judgment. “Objections which go to the judgment only, and do not extend to the verdict, can not properly be made grounds of a motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cutsinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Thomas v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. McWhorter v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Brannan v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Whitehead v. DillardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Turner v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Frazier v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Elder v. StarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API