Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 2004No. 3D02-11PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal recurs upon a mandate issued by the Supreme Court of Florida on December 11, 2003. We vacate the harmless error analysis portion of our previous opinion, recorded at 834 So.2d 923, and conform in all respects to the opinion of the Supreme Court recorded at 863 So.2d 1189 (Fla.2003). As directed by that opinion and mandate we now apply the principles announced in Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999), and State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and reconsider this matter under the DiGuilio harmless error standard.

Accordingly, we hereby affirm the conviction and sentence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API