Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 13, 1990No. 890385-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Judge:

Jamis M. Johnson appeals from a deficiency judgment entered against him after a trust deed foreclosure. We affirm and remand to the district court for a determination of attorney fees incurred on appeal by the appellees, collectively referred to here as Thomas.

This action arises out of Johnson’s purchase of a Salt Lake City residence from Thomas in September 1984 for $33,000. Johnson made an $8,000 down payment and executed a $25,000 note secured by a deed of trust on the property. After Johnson defaulted on his note payments in the spring of 1987, the trustee commenced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Occidental/Nebraska Federal Savings Bank v. MehrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Concepts, Inc. v. First Security Realty Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Five F, L.L.C. v. Heritage Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. Pierucci v. U.S. Bank, NACourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. RM LIFESTYLES, LLC v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  4. Green v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2006
  5. Antion Financial, LC v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API