Legal Opinion
Layne v. Henderson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1928No. 3433PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
Plaintiff alleges that he is a licensed attorney-at-law, practicing his profession in the city of Monroe, and that the defendant, Henderson, is due him the sum of $1572.50, for his services as attorney, rendered on behalf and for the benefit of the defendant during the summer and fall of 1926. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of his petition read as follows:
“(4) That during the said summer of 1926 the said J. E. Henderson af°resaid consulted with your petitioner on several occasions concerning a tract of land which he had for sale, and on which there were such incumbrances and such clouds on the title as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stanford v. BischoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaufman Agency v. ViccellioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Bruno v. GauthierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Ruiz v. TrocchianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949