Legal Opinion

Layne v. Henderson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1928No. 3433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

Plaintiff alleges that he is a licensed attorney-at-law, practicing his profession in the city of Monroe, and that the defendant, Henderson, is due him the sum of $1572.50, for his services as attorney, rendered on behalf and for the benefit of the defendant during the summer and fall of 1926. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of his petition read as follows:

“(4) That during the said summer of 1926 the said J. E. Henderson af°resaid consulted with your petitioner on several occasions concerning a tract of land which he had for sale, and on which there were such incumbrances and such clouds on the title as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stanford v. BischoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaufman Agency v. ViccellioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Bruno v. GauthierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Ruiz v. TrocchianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API