Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Public Service Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1991No. Docket 112586PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an opinion and order entered by the Ingham Circuit Court which affirmed the March 29 and July 24, 1985, orders of defendant Public Service Commission awarding an electric rate increase to intervening defendant Consumers Power Company in order to ensure the continued solvency of the utility in the face of the debt incurred in the construction of its Midland Nuclear Power Plant. The circuit court reasoned that the costs of the Midland project had not been shifted to Consumers’ customers because these costs were expressly eliminated from the rate base…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Attorney General v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Attorney General v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. City of Holland v. Consumers Energy CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. CMS Energy Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd. Partnership v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API