Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 23, 1930No. 13286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Conviction is supposed to be for an aggravated assault, with punishment by fine of $25.00.

The state's attorney calls to our attention the fact that no notice of appeal is shown by the record. This is absolutely essential. Art. 827, C. C. P.; Palmer v. State, 141 S.W. 109; Gentry v. State, 10 S.W.2d 732; See Notes under Art. 827, Vol. 3, Vernon's Tex. C. C. P.

A hasty examination of the record further reveals that it shows no judgment of conviction. It does show the verdict of the jury, but if judgment was entered thereon the record fails to bring it forward. Donegan v. State, 89 Tex.Crim.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Donegan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Gentry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Cane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Kolos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Irlbeck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API