Legal Opinion

Patten v. Ramsey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1912No. 1297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

■ Brror from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Ennis Patten against James J. Ramsey. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

Under the rules of this court, the only question presente.d for review by plaintiff in error’s brief is that the triál court committed error in taxing all the costs against plaintiff in-error, plaintiff below. This case was originally comm.enc.ed in the district court of Kay county by petition of plaintiff, declaring upon a cause of action against defendant for maintaining a nuisance, to the injury of plaintiff’s property, personal health, and comfort, and praying for an injunction to abate said nuisance. After answer was filed by defendant, two interlocutory orders were made by.the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Waterman v. AldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McGillvray v. MoserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Opinion No. 72-231 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972
  3. Opinion No. 72-231 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API