Bobruk v. State

Appellant was convicted of having in his possession intoxicating liquor, in violation of §4 of the act of 1925 (Acts 1925 p. 144, ch. 48, §2717 Burns 1926).

Overruling motion for new trial is the only alleged error assigned; and the only reasons for new trial presented are that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that the court erred, in overruling appellant’s motion to suppress certain evidence obtained by a search warrant.

In determining, on appeal in a criminal case, whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding of guilty, only the evidence…