Legal Opinion

Franklin Dover v. Warden John Palmer

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 2, 2026No. 9:25-cv-02574Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Franklin Dover, C/A No. 9:25-cv-02574-JFA-MHC Petitioner, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Warden John Palmer, ORDER Respondent. I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Franklin Dover, (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, brings this action for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.), the case was referred to the Magistrate Judge for initial review. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge performed an initial review of Respondent’s Return and Motion for Summary Judgment.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API