Legal Opinion

Lane v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 5, 1982No. 80-803PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole issue in this case is whether a defendant who entered a plea of guilty to a capital offense, and who was sentenced to life without parole, is entitled to withdraw that plea of guilty and obtain a new trial in light of Beck v.Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 100 S.Ct. 2382, 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980); on remand, Beck v. State, 396 So.2d 645 (Ala. 1981) (wherein the Court held that the constitutionally infirm clause in Alabama's death penalty statute, which precluded trial judges from giving lesser included offense instructions in capital cases, could be severed from the death penalty statute).

When…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Spears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Crosslin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Ex Parte HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API