Legal Opinion

Hartje v. Hartje

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1909No. Appeal, No. 89PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal, No. 89, April T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1906, No. 159£, allowing alimony and counsel fees in case of Augustus Hartje v. Mary Scott Hartje. Petition for allowance to wife, respondent, for alimony, counsel fees-and expenses. Error assigned was order on the petition.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Oblady, J.,

This appeal is from an order made June 17, 1907, refusing *492libelant's request for the appointment of an examiner to take testimony of witnesses, and a further order making absolute a rule at the instance of the respondent for allowance of counsel fees and expenses incurred in defending this proceeding.

The parties were married March 15, 1894, and lived together about eleven years, during which time four children were born, two of whom died when four or five years of age, and at the inception of this proceeding there was living a son, twelve years of age, and a daughter aged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Breinig v. BreinigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Appeal of PowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. Fernald v. FernaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Graves v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brong v. BrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Rutherford v. RutherfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Rothman v. RothmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Oswald v. OswaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Campana v. CampanaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API