Legal Opinion

Smith v. Furlong

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1999No. 98CA0636PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge HUME.

Plaintiff, Ronald Lee Smith, an inmate in the custody of the Department of Corrections (DOC), appeals from the trial court’s order denying his post-judgment motions seeking an award of attorney fees and costs following the reversal of the DOC’s disciplinary ruling against him in the underlying judicial review proceedings. We affirm.

Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed a complaint challenging the DOC’s disciplinary action against him pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4), naming various officials of the DOC involved in the disciplinary action as defendants. Defendants later…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harold Dean Turman, Richard C. Wood v. Harold Tuttle, Buck Friend, Vivian Hawvery and Charles MarriottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Zick v. KrobColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. In Re the Marriage of JaegerColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Lucero v. CharnesColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Stevens v. Liberty Loan Corporation of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. In Re GomezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2001
  3. Prefer v. PHARMNETRX, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Branch v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People in re L.J.P.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API