Legal Opinion

People v. O'Leary

California Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1888No. 20,358PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Yolo County; C. H. Garoutte, Judge. Information against Arthur O’Leary for practicing medicine without a certificate. Defendant was convicted, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C. C.

The information filed against the defendant charged him with practicing medicine at a time when he had not obtained a certificate authorizing him to do so, as required by the “Act to regulate the practice of medicine in the state of California” (DBering’s Penal Code, pages 625-629). The defendant demurred to the information, and his demurrer was overruled. We see no error in this ruling. The information charged the offense in language sufficiently full and explicit. The defendant then pleaded not guilty, and asked to have further pleas entered as follows: “Further pleading to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FuquaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Application of HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Putman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Gaines v. United StatesCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API