Legal Opinion

Mills v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1994No. 20823PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

In this case we address the issue of whether a letter written by a defendant to a district judge qualifies as an application for post-conviction relief under Idaho Code § 19-4901. We also address the question of whether a motion brought under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 can toll the five-year limitation on post-conviction applications formerly imposed by Idaho Code § 19-4902. 1 On the facts of this case, we hold that the district court correctly ruled that the letter did not qualify as an application for post-conviction relief, and that the Rule 35 motion did not toll the time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hanks v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Gomez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Freeman v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. GorhamIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sayas v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Schwartz v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API