Mills v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge.
In this case we address the issue of whether a letter written by a defendant to a district judge qualifies as an application for post-conviction relief under Idaho Code § 19-4901. We also address the question of whether a motion brought under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 can toll the five-year limitation on post-conviction applications formerly imposed by Idaho Code § 19-4902. 1 On the facts of this case, we hold that the district court correctly ruled that the letter did not qualify as an application for post-conviction relief, and that the Rule 35 motion did not toll the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Hanks v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gomez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Freeman v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. GorhamIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sayas v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- Schwartz v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008