Legal Opinion

Carleton Studio, Ltd. v. Mony Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated September 24, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is barred by the doctrine of laches.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although the defendant correctly asserts that the doctrine of collateral estoppel is not applicable under the circumstances of this case (see Matter of Hunter, 6 AD3d 117, 121 [2004], affd 4 NY3d 260…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. In Re the Estate of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Caporino v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Cohen v. KrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fitzsimmons v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. DePodwin v. FonvilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API