Legal Opinion

Assurance Wireless USA, L.P. v. Reynolds

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 9, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00483Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 ASSURANCE WIRELESS USA, L.P., et al., Case No. 23-cv-00483-LB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A 13 v. STAY PENDING APPEAL 14 ALICE B. REYNOLDS, et al., Re: ECF No. 39 15 Defendants. 16 17 The plaintiffs — T-Mobile and three of its subsidiaries — are wireless carriers that challenge a 18 new California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) rule that changes how California funds 19 universal-service programs, which expand public access to communications services. Under the 20 federal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Leiva-Perez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Doug Lair v. Steve BullockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. El-O-Pathic Pharmacy United States v. Hudson Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API