Legal Opinion

Piercefield v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 1994No. CR 93-646PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Gary D. Piercefield appeals from a conviction for Possession of Methamphetamine with the intent to distribute. His first point on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Due to the overwhelming and uncontested evidence presented by the State, we hold the evidence to be sufficient. He also challenges the Trial Court’s admission into evidence of two bags of methamphetamine and his statement to the effect that he was the owner of the bags. The Trial Court correctly denied the motions to suppress. Mr. Piercefield further claims the Trial Court erred by admitting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Urquhart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Isbell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Bilderback v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Rockett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Hoay v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API