Legal Opinion

Wagner v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 12, 1960No. 64079; protests 59/5744 and 59/6159 (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The two suits listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, cover certain 6-volt and 12-volt flashers and parts, as well as barricade flashers, which were assessed with duty at the rate of 17% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, which provides as follows:

Electrical wiring apparatus, instruments (other than laboratory), and devices, finished or unfinished, wholly or in chief value of metal, and not specially provided…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Exchange, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. William H. Masson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API